AltLaw, the free legal search engine

Enter a case name, citation, or key words and phrases:

  • About This Site
  • Case Coverage
  • Browse All Cases
  • Advanced Search
  • Boolean Search

Search Results

Results 1 - 10 of 26 for citations:"42 F.3d 1399".

Sorted by relevance.
  • Sort by date
  • Pages:
  • « previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next »
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re F & N ACQUISITION COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Debtor. GOTTSCHALKS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Appellant, v. F & N ACQUISITION COMPANY, Appellee, and Citibank, Plaintiff.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
November 21, 1994
42 F.3d 1399
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Paul GULBENKIAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INRYCO, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
November 22, 1994
42 F.3d 1399
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Paul GULBENKIAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John H. DALTON, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Defendant-Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
November 22, 1994
42 F.3d 1399
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Earl DePONTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth KAMADA, Defendant-Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
November 17, 1994
42 F.3d 1399
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Anthony J. HARE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA; George Hart, Police Chief, City of Oakland; Robert J. Muszar, Captain of the Oakland Police Department, Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
November 25, 1994
42 F.3d 1399
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Judith Ann DALTON, Executrix of the Estate of Robert Dalton, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOGAN MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, a Delaware corp.; Thiokol, Inc., a Utah corp.; Morton International, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
November 17, 1994
42 F.3d 1399
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. ESTATE OF William PARRIS, By and Through Linda PARRIS, Administrator; Linda Parris, Administrator of the Estate of William Parris, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CNA INSURANCE COMPANIES, a business organization, form unknown; Transcontinental Technical Services, Inc., a corporation; Transportation Insurance Company, a corporation; CNA Casualty of California, a corporation; Does 1 Through 20; Inclusive, Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
November 14, 1994
42 F.3d 1399
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re William HALL; Eleanor Hall, Debtors. James RIGBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William HALL; Eleanor Hall, Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
January 17, 1995
42 F.3d 1399
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard Lee DUNCAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Fife SYMINGTON, et al., Defendant-Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
November 4, 1994
42 F.3d 1399
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. V. Robert COLTON, and Lottie S. Colton Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Bruce W. HALSTEAD, Defendant-Appellee. V. Robert COLTON, and Lottie S. Colton, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. STRONG POINT, INC., Defendant, and Rodger Garrity, Defendant-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
November 15, 1994
42 F.3d 1399
  • Pages:
  • « previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next »

Unless otherwise noted, all cases and statutes on this site are in the public domain.

DISCLAIMER: The people behind AltLaw are not your lawyers, and nothing on this site should be considered legal advice. We also make no representations or promises about the completeness, accuracy, or timeliness of any of the content on the site. AltLaw is a beta-release project, and we recommend that before relying on our site, you double-check your results with another legal research resource.