AltLaw, the free legal search engine

Enter a case name, citation, or key words and phrases:

  • About This Site
  • Case Coverage
  • Browse All Cases
  • Advanced Search
  • Boolean Search

Search Results

Results 1 - 10 of 21 for citations:"867 F.2d 615".

Sorted by relevance.
  • Sort by date
  • Pages:
  • « previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next »
Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. In re George L. KARAPINKA, Petitioner.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
November 18, 1988
867 F.2d 615
Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. COLT INDUSTRIES OPERATING CORP., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. INDEX-WERKE, K.G., HAHN & TESSKY, Defendant-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
November 9, 1988
867 F.2d 615
Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. CHROMALLOY AMERICAN CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Appellant/Cross- Appellee, v. B. Wallace FISCHMANN, an individual, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
November 17, 1988
867 F.2d 615
Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Ovidio MIRANDA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
December 15, 1988
867 F.2d 615
Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Lieutenant Colonel Albertis WILSON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Petitioner.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
November 18, 1988
867 F.2d 615
Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. INTERVET AMERICA, INC., Plaintff-Appellant, v. KEEVET LABORATORIES, INC., Robert D. Keenum and Keenum, Inc., Defendants- Appellees. INTERVET AMERICA, INC., Plaintff-Appellant, v. KEEVET LABORATORIES, INC., Robert D. Keenum and Keenum, Inc., Defendants- Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
November 4, 1988
867 F.2d 615
Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Thomas H. CALLAHAN, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the INTERIOR, Respondent.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
January 17, 1989
867 F.2d 615
Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. In re Richard K. JOHNSON and John W. Algeo.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
January 13, 1989
867 F.2d 615
Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. RAYCO, INC., Contractor; Russel E. Logan and Terry E. Logan, Completing Surety, Appellants, v. The UNITED STATES, Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
January 12, 1989
867 F.2d 615
Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Jonathan L. MOORES, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the NAVY, Respondent.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
January 10, 1989
867 F.2d 615
  • Pages:
  • « previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next »

Unless otherwise noted, all cases and statutes on this site are in the public domain.

DISCLAIMER: The people behind AltLaw are not your lawyers, and nothing on this site should be considered legal advice. We also make no representations or promises about the completeness, accuracy, or timeliness of any of the content on the site. AltLaw is a beta-release project, and we recommend that before relying on our site, you double-check your results with another legal research resource.