AltLaw, the free legal search engine

Enter a case name, citation, or key words and phrases:

  • About This Site
  • Case Coverage
  • Browse All Cases
  • Advanced Search
  • Boolean Search

Search Results

Results 1 - 10 of 22 for citations:"873 F.2d 1451".

Sorted by relevance.
  • Sort by date
  • Pages:
  • « previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next »
Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Simon Abi NADER, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Respondent.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
April 7, 1989
873 F.2d 1451
Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Anthony DURKAN, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Respondent.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
April 4, 1989
873 F.2d 1451
Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. In re George LEVITT.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
April 7, 1989
11 U.S.P.Q.2d 1315; 873 F.2d 1451
Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. George W. MATHEWS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the NAVY, Respondent.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
April 7, 1989
873 F.2d 1451
Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Marshall BIACHE, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the AIR FORCE, Respondent.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
April 13, 1989
873 F.2d 1451
Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. BLOUNT BROTHERS CORPORATION, Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
June 5, 1989
873 F.2d 1451
Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Carolyn E. LYLES, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the AIR FORCE, Respondent.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
April 11, 1989
873 F.2d 1451
Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. James CONSTANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ADVANCED MICRO-DEVICES, INC., Analog Devices, Inc., AT & T, FPS Incorporated, Fujitsu Limited, Fujitsu Microelectronics, Inc., NEC Electronics, Inc., and Texas Instruments, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 3, 1989
10 U.S.P.Q.2d 1797; 873 F.2d 1451
Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Ladelle STEPHENS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
February 21, 1989
873 F.2d 1451
Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Michael A. HAAS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the INTERIOR, Respondent.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 3, 1989
873 F.2d 1451
  • Pages:
  • « previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next »

Unless otherwise noted, all cases and statutes on this site are in the public domain.

DISCLAIMER: The people behind AltLaw are not your lawyers, and nothing on this site should be considered legal advice. We also make no representations or promises about the completeness, accuracy, or timeliness of any of the content on the site. AltLaw is a beta-release project, and we recommend that before relying on our site, you double-check your results with another legal research resource.