(Only cases currently available in AltLaw are listed.)
George A. Sanders, for plaintiff in error.
R. B. Lamon, for defendant in error.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment in this case is affirmed on the authority of Glenn v. Fant, 134 U. S. 398, ante, 583; Raimond v. Terrebonne Parish, 132 U. S. 192, ante, 57; Andes v. Slauson, 130 U. S. 435, 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 573; and Bond v. Dustin, 112 U. S. 604, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 296, and cases cited. Affirmed.
(Only cases currently available in AltLaw are listed.)
Disclaimer: The people behind AltLaw are not your lawyers, and nothing on this site should be considered legal advice. We also make no representations or promises about the completeness, accuracy, or timeliness of any of the content on the site. AltLaw is a beta-release project, and we recommend that before relying on our site, you double-check your results with another legal research resource.